<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</title>
	<link>http://imseo.org</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing &#38; Search Engine Optimization - IMSEO.ORG</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>A Quality Web Designer&#8217;s Review</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/a-quality-web-designers-review/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/a-quality-web-designers-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web Designer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/a-quality-web-designers-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their History 
Sinkle has a unique &#38; Effective way of developing websites. The web design comes from years of experience. Every website we build is based on your needs, not a generic template, Sinkle Developers started out designing websites more than 6 years ago. With this type of experience, we can surely develop what you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Their History </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sinkle.com/">Sinkle</a> has a unique &amp; Effective way of developing websites. The <a href="http://www.sinkle.com/web-design.php">web design</a> comes from years of experience. Every website we build is based on your needs, not a generic template, Sinkle Developers started out designing websites more than 6 years ago. With this type of experience, we can surely develop what you are looking for in a website. As much as web hosting, we want your website to have a professional, yet unique feel, which will help lead to your success.</p>
<p>Background: Sinkle Developers was established in February 2003 by the in name of Amty Designers. The concept is to build and establish a very informative website while also providing services to make it a one-stop shop for company and personal needs.</p>
<p><strong>Their Testomonials</strong></p>
<p class="right_articles">&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>Great communication with designer&#8230; incorporated all of my desires and changes without any hassles&#8230; was also very quick with the design and implementation of the site&#8230;</p>
<p>David</p></blockquote>
<p class="right_articles">&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>If there were a category above Excellent, like Outstanding, I would select it on all responses. Thanks for helping us move our company forward, and I would like to say, &#8220;Simply Professional&#8221;</p>
<p>Ali Khan</p></blockquote>
<p>Their work is always very good with <a href="http://www.sinkle.com/" target="_blank">affordable web design</a></p>
<p>I,ll also recommend you to try them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/a-quality-web-designers-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Godaddy .Com Discount Codes</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/09/discount-codes/godaddy-com-discount-codes/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/09/discount-codes/godaddy-com-discount-codes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Discount Codes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[.Com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Codes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Discount]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy.Com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/09/discount-codes/godaddy-com-discount-codes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Besy Discount Codes for Godaddy.Com

Godaddy .Com TLD Transfers
Price: $7.45
Coupon Code: comrenew
www.godaddy.com
Checked &#38; working when posted.
Thanks 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besy Discount Codes for Godaddy.Com</p>
<p><img src="http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q99/missnexus/GoDaddy.jpg" width="186" height="165" /></p>
<p>Godaddy .Com TLD Transfers</p>
<p>Price: $7.45</p>
<p><strong>Coupon Code: comrenew</strong></p>
<p>www.godaddy.com</p>
<p>Checked &amp; working when posted.</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://imseo.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/09/discount-codes/godaddy-com-discount-codes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Defends Google Deal</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/09/search-industry/google/yahoo-defends-google-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/09/search-industry/google/yahoo-defends-google-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Defends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Deal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Defends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/09/search-industry/google/yahoo-defends-google-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of a three-hour media day today, a Yahoo executive offered an interesting defense of the company’s pending search deal with Google. That deal, which was supposed to start in a few weeks, has come under increasing fire by people concerned that it will cement Google’s already huge lead in search advertising. Now, Justice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of a three-hour media day today, a Yahoo executive offered an interesting defense of the company’s pending search deal with Google. That deal, which was supposed to start in a few weeks, has come under increasing fire by people concerned that it will cement Google’s already huge lead in search advertising. Now, Justice is apparently looking whether there’s a case to quash the deal.</p>
<p>Hilary Schneider, executive vice president of Yahoo U.S., positioned the deal with Google as an extension of Yahoo’s partnerships by which other publishers such as hundreds of U.S. newspapers can sell ads on Yahoo properties. Her example: Search for “red roses in Birmingham Alabama” and you get no ads on Yahoo search results page. Google’s search results page has 11 advertisers. So by hooking up with Google, Yahoo is giving those advertisers a chance to reach Yahoo users as well as Google users and potentially get more customers. In Yahoo’s view, says Schneider, “We are able to essentially create more access and better ROI for the advertisers.”</p>
<p>Many advertisers don’t think that tradeoff is worthwhile because they believe they’ll pay more for the same results. Yahoo’s essentially saying that advertisers will be getting better results for their money, whatever they pay. I don’t envy the Justice Dept. trying to sort all this out.</p>
<p>Update: During questions after her presentation, Schneider said Yahoo is confident the company can get Justice “comfortable” with the deal by the planned early-October start of the deal. She said Yahoo is “actively involved in the conversation” with Justice on the deal.</p>
<p>Schneider shrugged off concerns by some advertisers that ad prices would rise after the deal. “Advertisers are rational and bid what they see value for,” she said. Also, she notes, Google advertisers today can’t reach Yahoo users with their ads, so the deal would help them do that and in the process serve Yahoo users with ads they didn’t get before.</p>
<p>Given all the furor of the last few days, I’m surprised Yahoo sounds so confident. It may not be long before we find out if that confidence is well-placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/09/search-industry/google/yahoo-defends-google-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Porn on a plane: Flight attendants want filters</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/internet-news/porn-on-a-plane-flight-attendants-want-filters/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/internet-news/porn-on-a-plane-flight-attendants-want-filters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Network access]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/internet-news/porn-on-a-plane-flight-attendants-want-filters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coffee, tea or porn? &#8220;I don&#8217;t think so,&#8221; say American Airline flight attendants.
Leaders of the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, which represents some 19,000 workers including American Airlines flight attendants, asked American Airline&#8217;s management this week to consider adding filters to its in-flight Wi-Fi access to prevent passengers from viewing porn and other inappropriate Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee, tea or porn? &#8220;I don&#8217;t think so,&#8221; say American Airline flight attendants.</p>
<p>Leaders of the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, which represents some 19,000 workers including American Airlines flight attendants, asked American Airline&#8217;s management this week to consider adding filters to its in-flight Wi-Fi access to prevent passengers from viewing porn and other inappropriate Web sites while in-flight.</p>
<p>A union representative told Bloomberg News that attendants and passengers have raised &#8220;a lot of complaints&#8221; over the issue.</p>
<p>American Airlines is one of several airlines testing in-flight Internet access as a way to lure more passengers. American has been offering the service on a limited basis since August 20th on some flights between New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, and between New York and Miami. The cost of the service on cross-country flights is $12.95, and it&#8217;s $9.95 on the New York to Miami route.</p>
<p>The current program is in a 3- to 6-month trial period, and the airline plans to review usage and feedback on the service at the end of that period, an American Airlines spokesman told Bloomberg.</p>
<p>The controversy has stirred up an ongoing debate about whether Internet access in public places should be restricted. Earlier this year, the Denver International Airport took a lot flack for blocking access on its free Wi-Fi network to Web sites that officials deemed offensive.</p>
<p>The argument was made by Denver airport officials that users must abide by their rules because they are providing the service for free. But that case is harder to make for in-flight passengers, who are paying for Internet access.</p>
<p>Given that people are packed onto planes literally elbow to elbow, it&#8217;s often hard not to at least glance at the laptop screen of the person sitting next to you. But airlines have not banned people from reading pornographic magazines or watching their own DVDs on flights. And it&#8217;s just as easy for someone to view a DVD of an adult video on a laptop or flip through Hustler as it is to surf porn Web sites.</p>
<p>The truth is that it hasn&#8217;t been a major problem on flights thus far. In fact, American Airline&#8217;s spokesman Tim Smith told Bloomberg that the &#8220;vast majority&#8221; of customers already use good judgment in what&#8217;s appropriate to look at while flying versus what&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>And he added, &#8220;Customers viewing inappropriate material on board a flight is not a new scenario for our crews, who have always managed this issue with great success.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think? Should airlines filter Internet access at 20,000 feet? Or should they just stay out of the censoring debate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/09/other/internet-news/porn-on-a-plane-flight-attendants-want-filters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Trends now for Websites</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/06/search-industry/google/google-trends-now-for-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/06/search-industry/google/google-trends-now-for-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Trends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/06/search-industry/google/google-trends-now-for-websites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new layer to Trends with Google Trends for Websites, a fun tool that gives you a view of how popular your favorite websites are, including your own! It also compares and ranks site visitation across geographies, and related websites and searches. 

Google Trends For Websites  
http://trends.google.com/websites       
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="arial">A new layer to Trends with Google Trends for Websites, a fun tool that gives you a view of how popular your favorite websites are, including your own! It also compares and ranks site visitation across geographies, and related websites and searches. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="arial"><br />
</font><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana"><a href="http://www.pubcon.com/redirect.cgi?f=30&amp;d=3679892&amp;url=http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/new-layer-to-google-trends.html" target="_top" title="googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/new-layer-to-google-trends.html">Google Trends For Websites</a>  </font></p>
<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana"><a href="http://www.pubcon.com/redirect.cgi?f=30&amp;d=3679892&amp;url=http://trends.google.com/websites" target="_top" title="http://trends.google.com/websites">http://trends.google.com/websites</a>    <!-- /post -->   </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/06/search-industry/google/google-trends-now-for-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Testing Alternative Fonts for Adsense</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/06/contextual-advertising/google-adsense-adwords/google-testing-alternative-fonts-for-adsense/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/06/contextual-advertising/google-adsense-adwords/google-testing-alternative-fonts-for-adsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adsense &amp; Adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alternative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fonts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Testing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Testing Alternative Fonts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/06/contextual-advertising/google-adsense-adwords/google-testing-alternative-fonts-for-adsense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, here as well. Including one very thin font (which genius thought of this?) and the beloved comic sans. Which is not funny. 
I sense a certain desperateness at The Plex. Yet they do not offer tools to really beef up the revenues for Google and for publishers. Sad.    
Saw it on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana">Yep, here as well. Including one very thin font (which genius thought of this?) and the beloved comic sans. Which is not funny. </font></p>
<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana">I sense a certain desperateness at The Plex. Yet they do not offer tools to really beef up the revenues for Google and for publishers. Sad.    </font></p>
<p><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana">Saw it on a 468*60 ad. I thought I messed it up with a CSS change somewhere for a second. I think it was comic sans too. Didn&#8217;t look professional at all.</font></p>
<p>see <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adsense/3678466.htm">discussion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/06/contextual-advertising/google-adsense-adwords/google-testing-alternative-fonts-for-adsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Yahoo Merger starts Again</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/05/search-industry/yahoo/microsoft-yahoo-merger-starts-again/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/05/search-industry/yahoo/microsoft-yahoo-merger-starts-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft &amp; MSN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Yahoo Merger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/05/search-industry/yahoo/microsoft-yahoo-merger-starts-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A potential partnership deal between Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. the companies revealed over the weekend may prove to be a stepping stone to an outright acquisition, analysts said on Monday.
UBS analysts said in a research note that the business discussions between Microsoft and Yahoo could be a prelude to an eventual outright acquisition offer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A potential partnership deal between <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft Corp</a>. and <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo Inc.</a> the companies revealed over the weekend may prove to be a stepping stone to an outright acquisition, analysts said on Monday.</p>
<p>UBS analysts said in a research note that the business discussions between Microsoft and Yahoo could be a prelude to an eventual outright acquisition offer because it was vital for Microsoft to acquire Yahoo on friendly terms.</p>
<p>&#8220;A near-term deal could act as an intermediate step that would go a long way toward testing the waters,&#8221; UBS wrote.</p>
<p>The brokerage said a Microsoft-Yahoo partnership is likely to focus on search advertising and should be seen as an alternative to a scenario in which Yahoo would outsource to Google Inc. part of its Web search ad sales.</p>
<p>Stifel Nicolas argued that Microsoft may be seeking to buy Yahoo&#8217;s search and search-advertising business outright, leaving Yahoo independent but smaller, focused on display advertising and Internet media businesses.</p>
<p>Stifel analysts George Askew and Scott Devitt warned that Yahoo must reach a deal with either <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> or Microsoft or face a bruising proxy battle with activist investor Carl Icahn, who is seeking to install his own slate of Yahoo directors.</p>
<p>Icahn launched a proxy campaign last Thursday to replace Yahoo&#8217;s board with directors who would reopen talks with Microsoft, saying Yahoo had acted irrationally in refusing the software company&#8217;s $47.5 billion bid.</p>
<p>The proxy battle &#8220;may ultimately drive a damaged Yahoo into Microsoft&#8217;s arms&#8221; at around $31 per share, Stifel said.</p>
<p>Microsoft made a $31-per-share cash and stock offer in late January. Earlier this month, Microsoft discussed raising that offer to $33 a share, but backed away after Yahoo management held out for $37 per share.</p>
<p>The software giant&#8217;s move to court Yahoo was likely to prompt the Icahn to press Yahoo to further pursue an alliance with Google, a person familiar with the billionaire investor&#8217;s thinking told Reuters on Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/05/search-industry/yahoo/microsoft-yahoo-merger-starts-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Piracy falls in Pakistan &#038; Top 12 Countries</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/05/other/internet-news/software-piracy-falls-in-pakistan-top-12-countries/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/05/other/internet-news/software-piracy-falls-in-pakistan-top-12-countries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cracks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pirated]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[serials]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[slightly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Piracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[warez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/05/other/internet-news/software-piracy-falls-in-pakistan-top-12-countries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The software piracy rate has slightly dropped in Pakistan from 86 per cent to 84 per cent, after remaining unchanged over the past two years, which would benefit the country in many ways, a latest international study states.
The software piracy rate in Pakistan has come down at a time when globally it recorded a three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software piracy rate has slightly dropped in Pakistan from 86 per cent to 84 per cent, after remaining unchanged over the past two years, which would benefit the country in many ways, a latest international study states.</p>
<p>The software piracy rate in Pakistan has come down at a time when globally it recorded a three per cent increase to 38 per cent in 2007, which has increased piracy-related losses to nearly $48 billion against $40 billion in 2006.</p>
<p>The Fifth Annual Global Software Piracy Study, released by the Business Software Alliance (BSA) here on Friday, noted that piracy-related losses had gone down to $125 million in Pakistan against $143 million in 2006.</p>
<p>With 84 per cent piracy, Pakistan now ranks 13th among top 25 countries with the highest piracy rates against No 7 last year.</p>
<p>It followed</p>
<ol>
<li>Armenia (93pc)</li>
<li>Bangladesh (92pc)</li>
<li>Azerbaijan (92pc)</li>
<li>Moldova (92pc)</li>
<li>Zimbabwe (91pc)</li>
<li>Sri Lanka (90pc)</li>
<li>Yemen (89pc)</li>
<li>Libya (88pc)</li>
<li>Venezuela (87pc)</li>
<li>Vietnam (85pc)</li>
<li>Iraq (85pc)</li>
<li>Indonesia (84pc)</li>
</ol>
<p>Source: <a href="http://a.com.pk/2008/05/internet-news/software-piracy-falls-slightly-in-pakistan/">Ahmad&#8217;s Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/05/other/internet-news/software-piracy-falls-in-pakistan-top-12-countries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Knows too much about us..Beware!</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/03/search-industry/google/google-knows-too-much-about-usbeware/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/03/search-industry/google/google-knows-too-much-about-usbeware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[about us]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Beware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google Knows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[too much]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/03/search-industry/google/google-knows-too-much-about-usbeware/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever you wondered what google knows about you ? 
Here is a small list of what they know about a person. Depending on which services he signs up for.

The Websites that he owns.
His Bank Account.
His Profession. (at least very very close. Like a dentist would search for his related stuff and thats how they can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9710/googleisevilcv1do9.jpg" alt="evil" align="right" /><strong>Ever you wondered what google knows about you ? </strong></p>
<p><strong>Here is a small list of what they know about a person. Depending on which services he signs up for.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Websites that he owns.</li>
<li>His Bank Account.</li>
<li>His Profession. (at least very very close. Like a dentist would search for his related stuff and thats how they can find out what you do)</li>
<li>Visitors to his website. (A lot of information about them, this can let them calculate a lot of things)</li>
<li>A lot of information about you also goes in the websites that you visit that use google analytics code.</li>
<li>Arial view of your house. If you have used google maps, you must have gone to check your house and must have gone to it a lot of times to show your friends and stuff. Or maybe worse marked it as “My House” .</li>
<li>They know his personal connections, like his friends and his friends and a lot of information about them too.</li>
<li> His full name</li>
<li>His verified Postal Address.</li>
<li>The web sites I visit, frequency of visit etc (this can be done through the google toolbar, which goes to their server to get the pagerank values etc.)</li>
<li> The Country that he lives in.</li>
<li>The browser that he uses.</li>
<li> The OS that he uses.</li>
<li> His video preferences.</li>
<li>The communities he belongs to</li>
<li>Credit Card information (In case of adwords)</li>
<li>Search Terms that you target</li>
<li>Who you send emails to</li>
<li>Who sends emails to you</li>
<li>The contents of those emails</li>
<li>Your chat using Google Talk.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are a webmaster and have websites that use google’s services. I think that this is not going to be a good idea. <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> knows a lot about us. And think about it, can’t they use this information to rank our websites. Why shouldn’t they. They are a very large company and know what they are doing. They also have to stay ahead of their competition and they have to constantly keep working on new ways to rank websites. Links Links and Links. Google is all about Links. They are going every direction to find our links. Business plus personal. They know everything about us (almost). Now with their phones coming up in the market they will also be able to locate your exact position.Although I use google’s services I have no other option no one ever dared to try and do something about this. But I have something in mind and just dont know how to go about it from here. I have put up websites, got users and very soon this will be launched and you can rest assured that no one is watching now.</p>
<p><strong>The internet is for information. Don&#8217;t let people misuse the power of the internet.</strong></p>
<h4>Wake up!! <img src='http://imseo.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </h4>
<p>see related Discussion at <a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=741626" target="_blank">Digitalpoint </a></p>
<p>Source:<a href="http://realwebserver.com/my-articles/google-knows-too-much-about-us-cant-they-use-this-information-to-rank-our-sites.html" target="_blank">The Real Web Server</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/03/search-industry/google/google-knows-too-much-about-usbeware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Atom&#8221; as name for Intel&#8217;s new chip family</title>
		<link>http://imseo.org/2008/03/other/atom-as-name-for-intels-new-chip-family/</link>
		<comments>http://imseo.org/2008/03/other/atom-as-name-for-intels-new-chip-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imseo.org/2008/03/other/atom-as-name-for-intels-new-chip-family/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Corp has picked &#8220;Atom&#8221; as the new brand name for its latest microprocessor, the world&#8217;s largest semiconductor company said.

The Intel Atom processor is the name for the new family of low-power processors, the brains of digital devices, that will power mobile Internet devices and ultra low-cost and small notebook and desktop personal computers.
Intel sees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.intel.com">Intel</a> Corp has picked &#8220;Atom&#8221; as the new brand name for its latest microprocessor, the world&#8217;s largest semiconductor company said.</strong><br />
<img src="http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t245/AMAccpq/intel.gif" alt="Intel Atom" align="right" /><br />
The Intel Atom processor is the name for the new family of low-power processors, the brains of digital devices, that will power mobile Internet devices and ultra low-cost and small notebook and desktop personal computers.</p>
<p>Intel sees a big market for the Internet-connected devices that can fit in one&#8217;s pocket and for what it is calling the netbook, a low-cost PC costing around $250.</p>
<p>The Intel Atom processor is based on a new microarchitecture designed for small devices and low power consumption, Intel said. The chip is less than 25 square millimeters, and 11 of the chip&#8217;s dies &#8212; the slivers of silicon with 47 million transistors each &#8212; would fit in an area the size of a U.S. penny.</p>
<p>The new chips, previously code-named Silverthorne and Diamondville, are made on Intel&#8217;s 45 nanometer chipmaking technology and slated for introduction toward the middle of this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Diamondville and Silverthorne both represent an attempt by Intel to sell chips profitably for a whole lot less,&#8221; said Nathan Brookwood, an analyst at market research firm Insight 64. &#8220;This is the first new processor design coming out of Intel since the Pentium Pro in 1995.&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://imseo.org/2008/03/other/atom-as-name-for-intels-new-chip-family/#more-150" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imseo.org/2008/03/other/atom-as-name-for-intels-new-chip-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
